Prediction of Akemi Nishiya vs Maja Zivec Skulj Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
A. Nishiya vs M. Zivec Skulj

Akemi Nishiya

JPN

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

112

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Maja Zivec Skulj

GER

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

112

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Nishiya 1 - 0 Skulj

They have played 3 sets in total, with Akemi Nishiya winning 2 and Maja Zivec Skulj winning 1. The last match between Akemi Nishiya and Maja Zivec Skulj was at the ITF Rheda Weiderbruck, 30-07-1990, Round: , Surface: Clay, with Akemi Nishiya getting the victory 6-3 1-6 7-6.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Nishiya	1
Skulj	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

() ITF Rheda Weiderbruck(07-30-90)

Stats

Akemi Nishiya

Maja Zivec Skulj

A. Nishiya vs M. Z. Skulj H2H Profile

A. Nishiya	Stats	M. Z. Skulj
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
44.17% (91-115)	Career Total W/L	56.03% (144-113)
1	Clay	0
1	Titles	3
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

A. Nishiya vs M. Z. Skulj Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Akemi Nishiya has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Maja Zivec Skulj has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Akemi Nishiya, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Maja Zivec Skulj has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Akemi Nishiya has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Maja Zivec Skulj has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Akemi Nishiya has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Maja Zivec Skulj winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Akemi Nishiya has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 22/22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/4). Maja Zivec Skulj has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 105/71), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 38% (W/L 3/5).
Player level: In the last year, Akemi Nishiya has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Maja Zivec Skulj has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Akemi Nishiya winning 1 times and Maja Zivec Skulj being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Akemi Nishiya winning 2 and Maja Zivec Skulj winning 1.
The last match between Akemi Nishiya and Maja Zivec Skulj was at the ITF Rheda Weiderbruck, 30-07-1990, Round: , Surface: Clay, with Akemi Nishiya getting the victory 6-3 1-6 7-6.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Akemi Nishiya has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Maja Zivec Skulj has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Akemi Nishiya has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Maja Zivec Skulj has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Akemi Nishiya has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Maja Zivec Skulj has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Akemi Nishiya vs Maja Zivec Skulj Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

A. Nishiya vs M. Z. Skulj H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

A. Nishiya	Stats	M. Z. Skulj
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
14	Games Won	15
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

A. Nishiya Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Osaka - 04-02-1992
Q1 Hiroko HaraH. Hara	L	7-5 6-3	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 13-01-1992
Q1 Ingelise DriehuisI. Driehuis	L	6-4 2-6 6-4	Stats
Brisbane - 30-12-1991
Q1 Noelle Van LottumN. Van	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
ITF Chiba - 04-11-1991
Mana EndoM. Endo	L	3-6 6-1 6-3	Stats
R4 Helena VildovaH. Vildova	W	6-3 6-2	Stats

View All

M. Z. Skulj Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Salzburg 25K - 09-12-1996
R3 Sandra KleinovaS. Kleinova	L	4-6 6-3 6-2	Stats
Bad Gogging 25K - 11-11-1996
Raluca SanduR. Sandu	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
R3 Patty Van AckerP. Van	W	6-2 6-0	Stats
R4 Magdalena FeistelM. Feistel	W	7-6 6-7 6-2	Stats
Stockholm 25K - 28-10-1996
R3 Barbara SchwartzB. Schwartz	L	6-2 7-5	Stats

View All

A. Nishiya vs M. Z. Skulj Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

A. Nishiya	Stats	M. Z. Skulj
44.17% (91/115)	YTD Win/Loss	56.03% (144/113)
45.38% (211/254)	Sets Win/Loss	53.99% (325/277)
48.48% (2055/2184)	Games Win/Loss	52.06% (2813/2590)
41.84% (41/57)	Hard Win/Loss	45.45% (20/24)
50.00% (22/22)	Clay Win/Loss	59.66% (105/71)
47.06% (8/9)	Indoor Hard W/L	55.56% (15/12)
0.00% (0/4)	Grass Win/Loss	50.00% (1/1)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
423.09	Average Opponent Rank	366.86
0.00% (0/2)	Slam W/L	0.00% (0/2)
52.05% (38/35)	Challenger W/L	64.67% (108/59)
51.35% (19/18)	Futures W/L	37.50% (3/5)
44% (89/203)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	56% (141/251)
60% (9/15)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	59% (10/17)
45% (25/56)	Deciding Set Win %	57% (54/95)
85% (94/80)	1st Set Won, Won Match	80% (148/118)
14% (94/13)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	20% (148/29)
10% (112/11)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	22% (108/24)